Goole Action Group

19/03/2007 - Response to 'Low Demand and HMR Pathfinders'

By JOHN EARNSHAW

Hi Simon.   I have just read your wonderful article entitled: 'Once they called it Rachmanism. Now it's being done with taxpayers' money' and have read many of the responses, some good, some bad and some ugly or otherwise totally incorrect.

I am the Low Demand Project Manager with the Empty Homes Agency - see Empty Homes Agency and would like to recommend a book called 'An Introduction to Urban Renewal' by Michael S Gibson (Birmingham Polytechnic) and Michael J Langstaff (North British HA) and which was published in 1982.

It shows how successive generations and governments have simply, without much thought or otherwise, 'thrown money' at regeneration schemes in an effort to try and resolve the housing/social problems and all of which, in time, proves nothing and the problems just re-occur twenty years or so later on!

They need to look at the bigger picture and much wider issues, the what I call 'ABCD factor' - anti social behaviour, crime and drugs and look at whether Community Anchors (schools, shops, hospitals and parks and open spaces etc are in place, otherwise, if they are not, regeneration will fail miserably! 

It is time for a much needed change of direction with regeneration procedures and more innovative solutions!

As project manager, I have been involved with many of the affected community groups in England (Pathfinder and Non-Pathfinder) and have helped and supported them right up to the present time. All most of them really want, is an equal say in their future community redevelopment, after all it is their community and without them, there would be no communities! They need (and deserve) quality consultation and engagement! They are not out to get rich quick!

I am currently advocating to the many local authorities and pathfinders I am working with, that they seriously consider setting up, from day one, 'local community partnerships' who will deal with the issues in their communities and who will jointly make recommendations regarding CPO's, demolition, refurbishments, remodelling, voluntary acquisitions etc etc, after and not before, they have 'seriously' engaged and consulted with the whole of the 'affected' community and not the usual 20 - 30% unrepresentative surveys as at present.

This will obviate the need for expensive, complicated and time consuming CPO's and any dwellings required for any subsequent demolition and/or 'thinning out' can be acquired by voluntary acquisition, as they will have the full backing and support of the newly formed 'Local Community Partnership'.

Please see the HALIFAX report below on terraced housing, which is good, strong evidence to support the keeping of much of our terraced housing in our current times of an acute housing shortage across the country.


Back to News